Legal reframing of child support and educational continuity: academic impacts, pedagogical support,
and a proposal for conditional extension
Bryan Hernán Puente Chaquinga
Johnny Segundo Campoverde López
Josué Bonilla Tenesaca
Volumen: 18
Recepción: 03/06/2026
Número: 3
Trimestre: julio-septiembre
Aprobado: 17/09/2026
Año: 2026
Artículo de revisión
continuity depends not only on the conditions provided by educational institutions, but
also on the personal, family, legal, and economic circumstances surrounding the
student.
These circumstances include difficulties related to the determination, adequacy,
payment, and continuity of child support. Although the existence of a judicial proceeding
does not, by itself, cause an educational impact, delayed, insufficient, unpaid, or
terminated child support may limit the resources available for food, transportation,
internet access, educational materials, housing, and other expenses required to
continue studying. These circumstances may be related to difficulties in attendance,
participation, motivation, organization of responsibilities, and academic performance,
creating possible situations of socioeducational vulnerability. The right to maintenance
has a comprehensive purpose that is not limited to providing food. Unnumbered Article 2
of Title V of the Code on Children and Adolescents expressly includes education among
the protected needs. In this regard, Puente Chaquinga, López Soria, and García
Segarra (2025) identified difficulties concerning the clarity and consistency of the legal
concepts used to calculate child support, as well as its timely payment. Therefore, they
emphasized the need to adapt its regulation to current family, social, and economic
circumstances. These difficulties go beyond the judicial sphere when they reduce the
ability of child support to meet the educational needs of the beneficiary.
In addition, paragraph 2 of Unnumbered Article 4 of Title V of the Code on Children and
Adolescents recognizes the right to maintenance for adults up to the age of 21 who are
studying, when their education prevents or makes it difficult for them to engage in paid
work and when they lack sufficient resources of their own. However, this age limit may
not reflect the actual duration of some technical, technological, or university degree
programs. As a result, protection may end while the student is still studying and remains
economically dependent. In this situation, pedagogical support may address some
academic and socioemotional difficulties, but it cannot replace the material resources
required to ensure educational continuity.
Within this context, the study analyzes the relationship between child support difficulties
experienced by student beneficiaries in judicial proceedings conducted in Ecuador and
possible manifestations of socioeducational vulnerability. Using a quantitative approach,
descriptive scope, non-experimental design, and cross-sectional structure, the study
applies a structured questionnaire to examine participants’ knowledge of the law, legal
experiences, perceived educational impacts, support received, and assessment of the
proposed reform. Based on the results, the doctrinal review, and the analysis of
Ecuadorian law, the study proposes a conditional extension of the right to maintenance
until the age of 25. This extension would require periodic evidence of enrollment, regular
academic participation, economic dependence, and insufficient personal resources. In
exceptional cases, when the beneficiary reaches this age before completing a degree
program whose official duration justifies continued support, a temporary and proportional
supplementary educational contribution is proposed, subject to judicial assessment. In
this way, the study connects pedagogical support with legal mechanisms intended to
Página 82